New Reviews

Michael Marshall ‘The Upright Man’ Review


9780515136388_p0_v1_s260x420

Written by: Wayne C. Rogers

Because I thoroughly enjoyed Michael Marshall’s The Straw Men, I quickly ordered its sequel and waited in excitement for the book to arrive.  I truly loved Marshall’s first novel, especially the concept of an actual housing community where only serial killers lived.  That was something new and intriguing to the genre, and I’d hoped that the second book would follow up on the concept.

Unfortunately for me, Marshall’s The Upright Man doesn’t come even close to equaling his first novel in this apparent trilogy, which is a huge disappointment.  I will say this book has a fabulous opening chapter, though it simply doesn’t follow through with the expectations it creates within the reader.

In this story, John Zandt (ex-LAPD Homicide Detective), following a tip, leads Ward Hopkins (ex-CIA agent) to an area in Washington State called Dry Creek where over a dozen corpses have been left by either the Straw Men, or the Upright Man.  Some of the bodies have been left in rather unusual and humorous positions.  Zandt and Hopkins check out the crime scene, then go their separate ways.  That’s pretty much the last time Dry Creek is mentioned in the book.

Anyway, John Zandt goes off on his own path, methodically hunting down members of the Straw Men in a vengeful search for the Upright Man.  Little is known about Zandt’s journey till the very end.  Ward, however, tries to hide from the Straw Men, but eventually gives up and begins to search for information about The Upright Man’s past, starting in San Francisco.

While Ward’s search for information is going on, Nina Baynam (FBI agent and Zandt’s former lover) finds herself involved in a double-murder case in Los Angeles that may involve the Straw Men.  So far everything is set up nicely to hook the reader into this tale of woe.

What throws the book off course for me is another subplot involving a salesman by the name of Tom Kozelek, who attempts to commit suicide by walking ten miles into a snow-filled forest with nothing but booze and pills to keep him company, and the distinct possibility that Big Foot is actually real.  It’s seems that the strange citizens of Sheffer, Washington are hiding some deep, dark secret.  This subplot takes away from the rest of the story and eats up at least a hundred pages of the book.  Each time a new chapter came along that dealt with good-old Tom and his sighting of Big Foot, I found myself scratching my head in confusion, wondering why the author was even including this stuff in the novel.  I wanted to skip over these chapters (and almost did a couple of times), but I was afraid I’d miss something important with regards to the rest of the novel.

Of course, the whole point of this particular subplot becomes clear near the end, but I didn’t find the answers very satisfying.  It’s only because I liked the parts dealing with Nina Baynam and Ward Hopkins that I’m even giving this novel a three-star rating.  And, it’s only because I loved The Straw Men so much that I’d even consider buying the third book in the series, which is Blood of Angels

Michael Marshall has already proven he can write an action-packed, edge-of-your-seat thriller that’s filled with new and fascinating ideas.  The author is also great at creating strong and interesting characters–both protagonists and antagonists– and at weaving a complex story line, intertwined with several adrenaline-charged subplots that merge together at the end to form a very satisfying finale (at least in his first novel).

If you’ve read The Straw Men and are somewhat like me in reading tastes, you’ll want to buy The Upright Man and draw your own conclusions.  I’m hoping Blood of Angels will equal the first novel in scope and excitement.

Order it here.

Rating: 3/5

About The Overseer (1669 Articles)
Author of Say No to Drugs, writer for Blumhouse, Dread Central, Horror Novel Reviews and Addicted to Horror Movies.

8 Comments on Michael Marshall ‘The Upright Man’ Review

  1. Wayne…I have not read Straw Men but your review drew me into wanting to. As far as this one goes I also have dealt with subplots that throw me off . I often wonder why things are thrown in there…much like you mentioned in this review.Nonetheless I am encouraged to give this set of stories a read. just me…Vitina

    Like

  2. Still have to check out Straw Men! Excellent review.

    Like

  3. Wayne C. Rogers // October 15, 2013 at 12:43 am // Reply

    I wanted to enjoy The Upright Man. The Straw Men was so well done, I didn’t know how I could go wrong with the sequel. But, I simply didn’t like it and that’s just me. Others must have enjoyed it or the third book wouldn’t have been published. Anyway, I’ve put off reading the third in the trilogy (Blood of Angels).

    Like

  4. Aww, I liked Straw Men! Now I’m disappointed that you’re disappointed with The Upright Man. I’m still going to read it, after all I am the one person who loved The Lone Ranger with Johnny Depp! LOL

    Like

  5. I am completely with you. I was so disappointed with this book, I’m afraid I gave up on it after about 100 pages. Likewise, I have Blood Of Angels, but it remains unread. Shame, as this could have been a special trilogy of books.

    Like

  6. Wayne C. Rogers // October 15, 2013 at 1:04 pm // Reply

    Dave, I’m glad I’m not the only one who felt this way about The Upright Man. What I think happened, and I could be wrong about this, is that The Straw Men was written as a stand-alone novel. The publisher liked it so much that they asked the author to do a sequel and he had to come up with something fast. I’m taking a guess here because the second book is so different from the first one.

    Paula, Don’t worry about The Upright Man. You may end up liking it. The Straw Men, however, can be read as a single book. I haven’t seen The Lone Ranger as of yet. I’m waiting for the DVD to come out in another month or so. I might end up enjoying it.

    Like

  7. I really enjoyed Lone Ranger myself – great fun buddy comedy elements and amazing action scenes/muscular filmmaking by Verbinski. Not as good as Pirates 1 and clearly channels the formula and transposes that concept to the Wild West (and possible why critics savaged it – they hate it when Hollywood tries to duplicate a successful formula even if it’s done well). Far superior to any of the Pirate sequels which I wasn’t a fan of.

    Like

  8. Paula…Anything with Johnny Depp gets my vote…if nothing else I can enjoy him….The Lone Ranger is a Big I am going to see one…when I can get it on DVD or Net Flix……William …i agree with you about the Pirates stories…but again this old hippie will still watch the other ones because Depp makes for nice eye candy ….may be getting older but not dead yet. Wayne I was so impressed with this review …just saddened to hear it fell short of what you were expecting…as always…just me…vitina

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: